What the writers, politicians, critics or antagonists say, you must have great magnitude to swallow. You can't make collective denunciation," a bench comprising Justices Dipak Misra and RF Nariman said. The bench after perusing the judgement of Punjab and Haryana High Court, said it only says that Nathuram Godse was an RSS worker and added that Godse killed Gandhi and RSS killed Gandhi are two different things.The apex court said that they have applied their mind and Rahul Gandhi will have to face the trial in the case.It also said "the purpose of law is not to convert people into litigants.The bench said that "freedom is not crippled or curbed.According to reports, the Congress vice-president had also turned down the Supreme Court's offer to express regret for his comment holding the RSS responsible for Mahatma Gandhi's assassination and get the defamation case filed against him buried.

Gandhi's counsel had earlier argued that there are several judgements and evidences that would prove that the defamation case filed against him was frivolous. New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday observed that Rahul Gandhi, who blamed RSS for assassination of Mahatma Gandhi, should not have resorted to "collective denunciation" of an organisation and will have to face trial in the defamation case against him if he does not express regret.The apex court had on July 9 heard the plea of Gandhi seeking a stay on the Bombay High Court order, refusing to quash the defamation case against him over his remark on the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). Gandhi had earlier urged the apex court to reject the defamation case filed against him by the RSS in March.The apex court had earlier in April adjourned the plea till second week of May. Purpose of law is that people obey law.Rahul Gandhi had alleged that the RSS was responsible for the death of Mahatma Gandhi."The bench questioned the speech made by Rahul and wondered "why he made a speech quoting wrong historical fact".

"You have gone a way ahead and you can't make collective denunciation," it said.Earlier, Gandhi had accused the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the RSS of trying to create disruption in plural but harmonious social fabric in Assam."We have held it may be historically correct but the fact or the statement has to meet the test of public good.(This story originally appeared on Deccan Chronicle)."What we have to see is the petitioner's allegations come under Section 499 (defamation) of IPC or not. Over the years, attempts have been China wholesale Center hole grinding machine factory made to enter into the lives of historically eminent personalities to give a new dimension.Justice Misra said that "history is the greatest enemy of privacy."While quoting the recent order in a petition filed by DMDK leader and actor A Vijayakanth challenging the cases lodged against him and others in which the apex court has issued notice to Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, the bench said criticism of government is one thing and criticism of historical figure is another thing."Senior advocate Harin Raval, appearing for Rahul, said whatever was said in the speech was on the basis of government records and on the basis of decision of Punjab and Haryana High Court and he was not referring to RSS directly. Peace and harmony should prevail rather than chaos. What is curbed is freedom of speech. You have to face trial, if you don't express regret," the bench said. Judgement is already there